Toto wrote:Instead of the ratio Won/Lost it could as well be Won/(Won+Lost).
We already have this. It's called win percentage.
W/L is kind of weird. Never seen it used as a standard stat for any game.
M57 wrote:Toto wrote:Instead of the ratio Won/Lost it could as well be Won/(Won+Lost).
We already have this. It's called win percentage.
W/L is kind of weird. Never seen it used as a standard stat for any game.
Click on your profile. Then click on Opponents. This will make your day because it is awesome. Anyway, Toto is right. On that page Win% and (won/won+lost) are different.
Yertle wrote:Hmmmm, now I'm confused...
Hugh's profile:
Yertle 55 19 22 14 34.5% My profile:
Hugh 63 22 22 19 34.9%
Hugh's:
Mongrel 40 16 18 6 40.0% Mongrel's:
Hugh 40 18 16 6 45.0%
Mongrel+Hugh look fine, but why the discrepancy between mine and Hugh?
Ohhh, because the Private games thing right?
Of course there is this which is different too: Win record vs Hugh 21 / 62 (34%)
Just so we know who sees what: _I_ see 22-22-19 on MY profile and 22-19-14 when I click on Yertle's. So it matters who is viewing the profile as to what information you see. My guess is that Mongrel sees 21-21-10 when he clicks on his profile vs Hugh and then 16-18-6 when clicking on mine.
Yertle wrote:P.S. How about adding Board Name in the Games List pop-up window with the ability to sort by all those columns. :D
Done!
tom wrote:Yertle wrote:P.S. How about adding Board Name in the Games List pop-up window with the ability to sort by all those columns. :D
Done!
This just got SUPER COOL!
"But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will be first." Matthew 19:30 - Good strategy for life and WarGear!
Hugh wrote:M57 wrote:Toto wrote:Instead of the ratio Won/Lost it could as well be Won/(Won+Lost).
We already have this. It's called win percentage.
W/L is kind of weird. Never seen it used as a standard stat for any game.
Click on your profile. Then click on Opponents. This will make your day because it is awesome. Anyway, Toto is right. On that page Win% and (won/won+lost) are different.
Yes, W/(W+L) would be real nice - I wasn't on the same page (literally or figuratively).
Expressed as a percentage?
tom wrote:Expressed as a percentage?
Yes. People are much less comfortable with Per-37 :)
I don't know how you might delineate them. Something like "Win % vs. Opp." ?
I see 20-20-9 against Hugh.
I'll join your game of seven. I'm only comfortable fighting in my own backyard these days. On most other boards, I get Rocked-agons.
Edward Nygma likes this.
This is a very shiny new toy.
Further suggestion would be to take out Dev games.
I would like to know my record against Alpha without all the Dev games we have played for testing purposes mucking it up.
Yertle wrote:tom wrote:Yertle wrote:P.S. How about adding Board Name in the Games List pop-up window with the ability to sort by all those columns. :D
Done!
This just got SUPER COOL!
is this on the Home tab or on My Games? i see what i'm assuming is available board names in the pull down window on the Home tab or i see column header for board name on My Games tab (not sure which, if either, was there previously).
I believe they are talking about on your profile -> opponents -> click one of the double headed arrows in the played column.
Ozyman wrote:I believe they are talking about on your profile -> opponents -> click one of the double headed arrows in the played column.
ah, thanks.
I dropped Dev games and added a WinLoss% column.
Care to add a tooltip to what that means (same with Drawn, maybe even Win and Lost too)?
Also, perhaps this is specific to your profile tom, but it looks a bit wacky with the blank player names:
Opponent | Played | Won | Lost | Drawn | Win% | WinLoss% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joshka | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
Horseboy | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
Maximus II | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||
thefattomato | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||
Negativedestruction | 1 | 1 | ||||
Kaiser_Crane | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||
bcbud | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||
KrocK | 1 | 1 | ||||
Cabrao | 1 | 1 | ||||
1 | 1 | |||||
1 | 1 | |||||
1 | 1 | |||||
1 | 1 | |||||
Caarl | 1 | 1 | ||||
1 | 1 | |||||
54 Music | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
(And I'd like to report multi-accounts of tom and 54 Music :P)
"But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will be first." Matthew 19:30 - Good strategy for life and WarGear!
Hmm yes must be some accounts that were deleted from the very early days.
Enhancements
Capital abandonment is now allowed as long as you have at least one capital remaining. In Regular play this is checked at the time of making the attempted move. In SimulGear this is checked in two places - firstly your orders are checked when your orders are submitted to ensure you have not abandoned any capitals during the reinforcement phase. Secondly during the execution of your orders your attacks are automatically limited to ensure you never abandon your last capital.
Bug Fixes
Fixed bug submitting and reviewing boards which have scenarios
With the capital city reform, I noticed that if I have a tcapital that has 0, but I still own it, and units in another capital, if I try to fortify all of my units over, it leaves 1 in the previous capital.