I think we need a thread where we all accuse each other of cheating.

Actually, I mentioned in some other thread about a suspected cheater and nothing was done, maybe because it was just overlooked.  So let's get down to business:

Suspect: black-ops
Charge: Cheating

Evidence:

http://www.wargear.net/players/info/black-ops/Games%20List

Check out any game with mjhodges.

Recommendation: Doot 'em.

And so was written the book of Dooteronomy.

Such a boring case. One or two games at a time over a month totaling 10 games. Why did they even bother?

M, I wish I had thought of that! Would have made a great thread title.
A, True. Why waste the court's time?

Well, if all they play is two player games against the idiot account then no one is really harmed, and though it may bother me when people can so easily get to the top of #-of-game independent stat Uhmm.. like GAWP, I should just get over it - it's only a stat. But this is not usually their MO. ashm and black-ops both started to expand their operation to three player games and took advantage of other players, most of whom had no clue they were being cleaned out. In a one-off against someone that does this, if I didn't look at the history, I could see myself not even noticing. In other words, it's not just the cheater's stats that are being affected.

M57 wrote:

Well, if all they play is two player games against the idiot account then no one is really harmed, and though it may bother me when people can so easily get to the top of #-of-game independent stat

If it affects Rankings then it should matter.  If it was all Private games, then sure let him go at it, but Public games, even 1vs1 against yourself, shouldn't be allowed.

Yertle wrote:

M57 wrote:

Well, if all they play is two player games against the idiot account then no one is really harmed, and though it may bother me when people can so easily get to the top of #-of-game independent stat

If it affects Rankings then it should matter.  If it was all Private games, then sure let him go at it, but Public games, even 1vs1 against yourself, shouldn't be allowed.

Then the prosecution would like to note that black-op shares the number 1 GAWP position along with King James, ..who's partner's play looks very suspicious as well.

Thanks for renaming the thread - My title was pretty lame..

M57 wrote:

Thanks for renaming the thread - My title was pretty lame..

I didn't, but it is clever...although I don't really know what/where "doot" came from...

I don't remember who, but I think is was in the ashm/VITO thread). It just was one of those fortuitous typos..

Doot'em...was it an original asm typo?

EDIT: nope it was a Mongrelist typo post #5 of said thread.

Yay?

People are having fun with it, play it out.

You'll find that same sentiment somewhere in the "Five" thread.

I'm not 100% convinced with those two... seems to be going to an awful lot of effort try to have a real game with himself if so.

Did you look at the three player games?

Look at this one..

http://www.wargear.net/games/view/21569

At every alecadude attacks lala with all his might ..right down to 1sies, then King James goes in for the kill. KJ attacks lala in australia ONLY for the continental bonus. then of course, alecadude goes for the neutrals. It's blatant.

..of course, lala is never to be seen again on WG.

Agreed - dooted.

How about a separate forum for multi-account spotting?

As long as it has 'doot' in the title, probably a decent idea.

Uh what does doot mean again?

At the time, it meant I didn't know how to type.

Might need to be a little less cryptic... not like I don't like it!

I humbly suggest "These Doots Were Made for Walkin'"

But it might be best to attach some meaning to it.

Now taking suggestions:

1.) Death boot

or

2.) Canadian Doubt

or

3.) (Your response here)

DOOT = "Dood, you're gettin' the boot"