-
Thu 24th Jun 2010 00:25 #1 / 11
Seems odd here: http://www.wargear.net/boards/view/Across%20The%20Great%20Divide/Ratings
Randy e has a Rating but an Unrated star section. I thought that was required (or at least it should be...).
-
Thu 24th Jun 2010 16:13 #2 / 11
http://www.wargear.net/boards/view/Battle%20for%20New%20York/Ratings
http://www.wargear.net/boards/view/Castles/Ratings
http://www.wargear.net/boards/view/Crossword/Ratings
Here are a few more boards with Unratings
this one has a phantom rating
http://www.wargear.net/boards/view/Slasher/Ratings
-
Thu 24th Jun 2010 22:02 #3 / 11
Speaking of ratings.. How did you folks come to the decision that "Fair" is better than "Average"?
-
Fri 25th Jun 2010 18:42 #4 / 11
Am I the only one bothered by this? (yeah, I'm setting myself up)
Rating choices go from Average to Poor.. How am I suppose to rate something that is worse than average, but not poor.
Hint: How about Fair?
-
Fri 25th Jun 2010 20:14 #5 / 11
M57 makes a Fair point.
-
Sun 27th Jun 2010 00:39 #6 / 11
IF YOU ARE SUGGESTING ASM IS A GOOD PLAYER YOU WILL STOP NOW, OR I WILL CALL HR AND I WILL PUT AN END TO IT, FOR THAT IS WHAT IT SOUNDS LIKE TO ME.
I llol'd at that one. Or for those who prefer, I made an ALN.
-
Sun 27th Jun 2010 15:46 #7 / 11
I flipped them for you M57... Fair is now below Average.
-
Sun 27th Jun 2010 16:32 #8 / 11
..now all is right in the world.
-
Sun 27th Jun 2010 18:03 #9 / 11
tom wrote: I flipped them for you M57... Fair is now below Average.
And a fix to the real problem???
-
Sun 27th Jun 2010 18:05 #10 / 11
I took the easy one first :)
It's at the top of my ToDo list for next week.
-
Sun 27th Jun 2010 18:14 #11 / 11
And the 5 stars as Average seems most logical, although with a scale of 1-10 I guess Average would be on one side or the other no matter what. But Fair below Average makes sense too.
