-
Thu 16th Sep 2010 23:13 #21 / 25
-
Thu 16th Sep 2010 23:44 #22 / 25
Never Start Vast Projects With Half Vast Ideas.
?
-
Fri 17th Sep 2010 13:29 #23 / 25
Just doing my part to hold in Risky's big deal-ness
Tesc's suggestion is a pretty good quick n dirty way to do it without getting into too much complicated math. And doesn't have to deal with 'player skill level' which gets us into questionable territory.
Except I think he's got it backwards. More rounds = harder, not easier. Some sort of juggling with # of rounds and # of players and you've got a number.
-
Fri 17th Sep 2010 16:25 #24 / 25
asm wrote: Except I think he's got it backwards. More rounds = harder, not easier. Some sort of juggling with # of rounds and # of players and you've got a number.
Umh... when I wrote that I thought that with less rounds you can't miss a game, while with more rounds you can. But probably this is questionable
(=
-
Fri 17th Sep 2010 21:43 #25 / 25
Just doing my part to hold in Risky's big deal-ness
Basically my contention is that the more games in a tournament, the more confident one can be that the eventual winner 'deserved' the win. With fewer rounds you can get lucky a couple of times and win a tournament, so that should be less rewarding.
