-
Sun 2nd Dec 2012 19:33 #1 / 7
too bad that team-only boards don't really have a public ranking.
- AvA Bomber Command
- The Walking Dead
- etc.
-
Thu 6th Dec 2012 00:10 #2 / 7Standard Member
- Rank
- Lieutenant General
- Rank Posn
- #14
- Join Date
- Jul 12
- Location
- Posts
- 634
Fortune favors the bold, and chance favors the prepared mind...poq wrote:
too bad that team-only boards don't really have a public ranking.
- AvA Bomber Command
- The Walking Dead
- etc.
+1
-
Thu 6th Dec 2012 10:40 #3 / 7
I argued once that team games should go into overall rankings. TI didn't happen of course -
An alternative I have been thinking about would be a separate BC - type ranking for team games.
I know I enjoy team games - and esp. the board The Walking Dead - and would like some sort of rankings on that board
-
Thu 6th Dec 2012 12:07 #4 / 7
There is a board specific global team score. Why not use that?
-
Thu 6th Dec 2012 12:14 #5 / 7
By the way, Tom, can you separate the charts for specific scenarios? For some boards the different scenarios represent totally different game designs. A good example is Kjeld's War of the Ring map. There are two different team scenarios and one FFA, so most statistics displayed in the charts have lost all meaning. Also, the winning position chart would be incredibly useful if it were scenario specific. You could instantly tell if a scenario is balanced or not.
-
Fri 7th Dec 2012 00:12 #6 / 7
>Also, the winning position chart would be incredibly useful if it were scenario specific. You could instantly tell if a scenario is balanced or not.
Not necessarily. For example, in my invention map, I would love to know if the various seats are balanced, but the charts give stats by seat position (i.e. 1st to go, 2nd to to, etc.), whereas what I'd like to see is stats for red wins, vs. green wins, etc.
-
Fri 7th Dec 2012 04:45 #7 / 7
Ozyman wrote:
>Also, the winning position chart would be incredibly useful if it were scenario specific. You could instantly tell if a scenario is balanced or not.
Not necessarily. For example, in my invention map, I would love to know if the various seats are balanced, but the charts give stats by seat position (i.e. 1st to go, 2nd to to, etc.), whereas what I'd like to see is stats for red wins, vs. green wins, etc.
I assumed the colors are fixed to specific seat numbers for most scenarios. In the Muster of Rohan, for example, I believe gold is always in seat number one.
