User Tools

Site Tools


designer_workshop:review_board_criteria

This is an old revision of the document!


Review Board Criteria and Protocols

The process of Board Review is one of a subjective nature. Though not common, neither is it rare for there to be an area of a board's design that is debated. This page is meant to help all parties (both reviewers and board submitters) negotiate the process by better defining the site's standards. Here is the WarGear help page concerning the Review Process.

Mission

The Review Board's primary function is to ensure that a minimum standard of quality is met before boards become 'live' on wargear. Secondary goals and considerations include making the experience a positive one for the designer.

Standards

WarGear Standards use the IEEE style guide for standards. “Shall” is used to define a requirement that if not satisfied will prevent the board from going live. “Should” is used to suggest a best practice, but is not an automatic disqualification. See the super continents', or collector bonus continents.

Other

Protocols

————————————————————————————————————————————————
Discuss the content of this page
————————————————————————————————————————————————
designer_workshop/review_board_criteria.1377632992.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/10/26 09:33 (external edit)