Seems odd here: http://www.wargear.net/boards/view/Across%20The%20Great%20Divide/Ratings
Randy e has a Rating but an Unrated star section. I thought that was required (or at least it should be...).
http://www.wargear.net/boards/view/Battle%20for%20New%20York/Ratings
http://www.wargear.net/boards/view/Castles/Ratings
http://www.wargear.net/boards/view/Crossword/Ratings
Here are a few more boards with Unratings
this one has a phantom rating
http://www.wargear.net/boards/view/Slasher/Ratings
Speaking of ratings.. How did you folks come to the decision that "Fair" is better than "Average"?
Am I the only one bothered by this? (yeah, I'm setting myself up)
Rating choices go from Average to Poor.. How am I suppose to rate something that is worse than average, but not poor.
Hint: How about Fair?
M57 makes a Fair point.
I llol'd at that one. Or for those who prefer, I made an ALN.
I flipped them for you M57... Fair is now below Average.
..now all is right in the world.
tom wrote: I flipped them for you M57... Fair is now below Average.
And a fix to the real problem???
I took the easy one first :)
It's at the top of my ToDo list for next week.
And the 5 stars as Average seems most logical, although with a scale of 1-10 I guess Average would be on one side or the other no matter what. But Fair below Average makes sense too.