Thingol wrote: In reply to Ratsy, there are some of us over here who would like to play some "team" games in 1v1 or 1vteam format (such as Axis and Allies). Think about that board for a second. Most games are played 1v1 on the boardgame itself, even though it is a team 3v2 game. The game-makers knew this would likely occur. They have recommendations for 1v1, 1v2, 1v3, 2v2 and the traditional setup.

I'm not sure why you can't envision people would find entertainment in the ability to control all roles on a aparticular team. It would save on the headaches of communication and collaboration. After all, in WW2, there was one supreme Allied commander (and his name wasn't Eisenhower, it was George Marshall).

+1     +1

SquintGnome wrote:

Thingol wrote: In reply to Ratsy, there are some of us over here who would like to play some "team" games in 1v1 or 1vteam format (such as Axis and Allies). Think about that board for a second. Most games are played 1v1 on the boardgame itself, even though it is a team 3v2 game. The game-makers knew this would likely occur. They have recommendations for 1v1, 1v2, 1v3, 2v2 and the traditional setup.

I'm not sure why you can't envision people would find entertainment in the ability to control all roles on a aparticular team. It would save on the headaches of communication and collaboration. After all, in WW2, there was one supreme Allied commander (and his name wasn't Eisenhower, it was George Marshall).

+1     +1

This would be better off here..

http://www.wargear.net/forum/showthread/3590/Multiple_Seats_-_One_Player