-
Fri 4th Nov 2011 08:25 #1 / 10
Team ranking scores have been added to the main rankings page, game completion messages, player profile and stats areas.
Team rankings are calculated on the following basis:
Team 1 has players with scores 900,1000 and 1400 - so the average is 1100
Team 2 has players with scores 700, 800, and 900 - so the average is 800
Say that Team 1 wins, so each players gains/loses (1100/800)*20 points.
-
Fri 4th Nov 2011 11:09 #2 / 10
Nice, and you did it for all the previous games.
Thanks Tom
-
Mon 7th Nov 2011 11:06 #3 / 10
Sako wrote:
Nice, and you did it for all the previous games.
Thanks Tom
So we now have a "tag team" division on WG. Great new addition!
-
Tue 8th Nov 2011 07:59 #4 / 10
Two Eyes for An Eye, The Jaw for A Tooth
tom wrote:
Team ranking scores have been added to the main rankings page, game completion messages, player profile and stats areas.
Team rankings are calculated on the following basis:
Team 1 has players with scores 900,1000 and 1400 - so the average is 1100
Team 2 has players with scores 700, 800, and 900 - so the average is 800
Say that Team 1 wins, so each players gains/loses (1100/800)*20 points.
Thanks Tom. No doubt more team games will be played now.
I guess tournament team games are not taken into account ?
Just for newbs to understand better, Tom actually meant : say that Team 1 wins, so each players gains/loses (800/1100)*20 points.
Edited Tue 8th Nov 08:01 [history]
-
Tue 8th Nov 2011 10:49 #5 / 10
Yes that's correct - tournament scores are separate to regular gameplay same as non-teamplay games.
-
Tue 8th Nov 2011 15:06 #6 / 10
Toto wrote:
Thanks Tom. No doubt more team games will be played now.
Maybe somewhat, but team games still can't earn you any CP's and that is what most people are after.
-
Tue 8th Nov 2011 16:35 #7 / 10
It should be possible to play WG boards in real-time ..without the wait, regardless of how many are playing.
Amidon37 wrote:
Toto wrote:
Thanks Tom. No doubt more team games will be played now.
Maybe somewhat, but team games still can't earn you any CP's and that is what most people are after.
Not me -- I'm much more interested in a decent Global Score and H-rating. As there are more different type of boards out there, it's more and more tempting to assume that players "specialize" or play boards they enjoy and are better at. Tournament scores are a different type of global score so in that sense, they are more important to me than a CP's as well.
https://sites.google.com/site/m57sengine/home
-
Tue 8th Nov 2011 17:00 #8 / 10
"If an incompetent chieftain is removed, seldom do we appoint his highest-ranking subordinate to his place" - Attila the Hun
Amidon37 wrote:
Toto wrote:
Thanks Tom. No doubt more team games will be played now.
Maybe somewhat, but team games still can't earn you any CP's and that is what most people are after.
I'm definitely more choiceful about my partners and map experience now that these games are ranked.
-
Wed 9th Nov 2011 11:55 #9 / 10
The probability of missing a 1/N event in N tries approaches 1/e as N gets large. I just wanted to put that in a signature.
Amidon37 wrote:
Toto wrote:
Thanks Tom. No doubt more team games will be played now.
Maybe somewhat, but team games still can't earn you any CP's and that is what most people are after.
Are you suggesting that the top team players on a board get regular CP's? Or are you suggesting that there be a completely separate CP system for team games only?
-
Wed 9th Nov 2011 17:38 #10 / 10
I would like to see team games counted into the regular "how good are you at this particular board" rankings. Look at the rankings on Tug of War for an extreme case of what is not happening.
(See also my rather longish post here http://www.wargear.net/forum/showthread/1854/Debate:_Board_Championship_and_Global_Ranking)
