-
Wed 21st Sep 2011 20:27 #61 / 66
Never Start Vast Projects With Half Vast Ideas.My argument was for ranked games, certainly for unranked (public or private) games I do not care.
-
Thu 22nd Sep 2011 08:24 #62 / 66
Toto wrote:
A long time ago, Tom agreed for a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 50, but this was unfortunately never implemented.
Hmm I'm not sure I ever agreed to this one... I'm not necessarily against it but would want to get more of a consensus from other players that this is a good idea.
Edited Thu 22nd Sep 08:33 [history]
-
Thu 22nd Sep 2011 08:51 #63 / 66
I think you had mentioned the Min of 5 because it came up in a thread about the possibility of not winning any points in a game. Not sure of the Max conversation though.
-
Thu 22nd Sep 2011 09:19 #64 / 66
Two Eyes for An Eye, The Jaw for A Tooth
tom wrote:
Toto wrote:
A long time ago, Tom agreed for a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 50, but this was unfortunately never implemented.
Hmm I'm not sure I ever agreed to this one... I'm not necessarily against it but would want to get more of a consensus from other players that this is a good idea.
Getting a consensus is a good idea, especialy as it's a rather important issue.
Reading again this thread could be an idea http://www.wargear.net/forum/showthread/1078p2/Unjust_Ranking_Calculation
,especialy the last message ;)
-
Thu 22nd Sep 2011 19:08 #65 / 66
It should be possible to play WG boards in real-time ..without the wait, regardless of how many are playing.
So is there any consensus here?
Is there support for the ability of creators of unranked games to filter their invitations for players whose ratings fall in a proximate range.
My vote: I don't care, but I have no problem with it. I.e., put it lower on the list.
https://sites.google.com/site/m57sengine/home
-
Thu 22nd Sep 2011 23:29 #66 / 66
"If an incompetent chieftain is removed, seldom do we appoint his highest-ranking subordinate to his place" - Attila the Hun
M57 wrote:
So is there any consensus here?
Is there support for the ability of creators of unranked games to filter their invitations for players whose ratings fall in a proximate range.
My vote: I don't care, but I have no problem with it. I.e., put it lower on the list.
I agree it should be low priority. I'm for just adding the "open game to +/- X pts." option within the Private game setup page.
