User Tools

Site Tools


proving_grounds:proving_grounds:universal_vs_autocapture_hierarchy

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
proving_grounds:proving_grounds:universal_vs_autocapture_hierarchy [2013/09/08 06:52]
M57
proving_grounds:proving_grounds:universal_vs_autocapture_hierarchy [2017/02/28 12:26] (current)
redshift
Line 5: Line 5:
 {{ :proving_grounds:proving_grounds:universal_vs_autocapture.png |}} {{ :proving_grounds:proving_grounds:universal_vs_autocapture.png |}}
  
-In the above..+In the above diagram, Abandon is OFF and T4 starts the turn owned by an opponent or NeutralT1 is a Universal Continent, and T2 is an AutoCapture Continent 
 + 
 +If a player owns T1 and T2, T4 will always be captured and have 1 unit. 
 + 
 +One might think that if T1 fires first, it would bring T4 down to 1 unit (without changing ownership) and then T2 would AutoCapture and put 5 units on T4 
 + 
 +Is this the intended behavior? If so, should it work this way? 
 + 
 + 
 +Answer: The game engine first checks all territories for active continents and lists their actions. Secondly, it hierarchises the actions based on action type. Capture and Neutralisation take precedence over factory bonuses. In this case, T2 captures T4, and then, the bonuses from T1 and T2 are summed and applied - if T3 is active, its bonus will also be summed to the total. This results in a negative number of units in T4, but when this happens the engine sets the number to 1 if Abandon is OFF or to 0 if Abandon is ON.
proving_grounds/proving_grounds/universal_vs_autocapture_hierarchy.1378637540.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/10/26 09:33 (external edit)