-
Sun 31st Jul 2011 20:22 #1 / 5"If an incompetent chieftain is removed, seldom do we appoint his highest-ranking subordinate to his place" - Attila the Hun
As a game Host is there a way for me to terminate a game even though all players have not voted? I'm in a game where all players verbally agreed to terminate but did not vote.
-
Sun 31st Jul 2011 22:44 #2 / 5
Assuming the game has started (and not a Dev game on your board), then the answer is No...at least I'm fairly certain.
Fathers, do not exasperate your children; instead, bring them up in the training and instruction of the Lord. Ephesians 6:4
-
Mon 1st Aug 2011 06:40 #3 / 5
It should be possible to play WG boards in real-time ..without the wait, regardless of how many are playing.AttilaTheHun wrote:
As a game Host is there a way for me to terminate a game even though all players have not voted? I'm in a game where all players verbally agreed to terminate but did not vote.
If you could (as host), what mechanism would be in place to stop you from terminating the game without a verbal agreement?
https://sites.google.com/site/m57sengine/home
-
Mon 1st Aug 2011 14:05 #4 / 5
~~~~~~~~~~
I know that on the feature request is a pop up screen, much like the card one, to allow the players to vote for a termination/surrender once a vote had been put in place. This hopefully solve that problem for you ATH. But there is no way to terminate a game, outside of dev, without a vote.
So, Beastlymaster, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb.
-
Mon 1st Aug 2011 14:55 #5 / 5
"If an incompetent chieftain is removed, seldom do we appoint his highest-ranking subordinate to his place" - Attila the Hun
Ok, it must have been the Development games where I remember the host terminating the game even though we had not "officially" voted.
Thx
