Would be epic if there were comms outages during games to make alliances harder. As well as random attacks occurimg over the game based on target attacks. Say for instance I was aligned with AOC in blue the whole time for a game, but then I had a rogue squad of 4 attack blue before end of turn, while comms were down. Would def spice up games… broken comms / saboteur mode.

I say this because often I’m already walking into games where there are allies against me (there’s def a a hegemonical group of players with phenomenal scores constantly assisting each other. So I think this mutiny mode could make the experience of new joiners to the platform a bit more fun and spicy!

Wait.....did.......ummm......did you just reference that you think that multiple accounts are working together in games......and then you forgot to change accounts before replying to your own post to say it's a good idea?

I'm not saying the idea is a bad one: I think it has merit. But just amused by the irony.

EDIT: Also, bravo on the use of the Seinfeld meme. Big fan.

Majorie Taylor Greene wrote: (there’s def a a hegemonical group of players with phenomenal scores constantly assisting each other.

We know you suspect there's something evil brewing at every corner Majorie, but let me assuage your fears. Alliances are legal on this site. However, consistently making predetermined alliances is considered to be cheating, and finding it done by the same people across multiple games is not all that hard. All you need to do is report those players with 'phenomenal' scores to Tom (referencing a few relevant games). He will do the research, ban those players and right all of your scores that have been wronged ..unless of course you think he's part of the conspiracy, and dines on trafficked baby flesh.👹

..I've always wanted to learn to play the hegemonica.

I'm not sure I understood the ideas being espoused, but I assume this part:

 random attacks occurimg over the game based on target attacks.

could be implemented using space lasers?

Boris, Ozyman, don’t make me start naming names… you know what I meant and mean.

tx

Will come back to Tom with some names. -- deletedbyadmin --

I turn over my regression and correlation data on file and we drain this deep swamp of mafiosos fixing games -- deletedbyadmin -- of dirty alliances may I be awarded a premium subscription for my good deeds this community and the good fight for integrity?

Are you really in the UK and named yourself after MTG? Is she well known over there?

I can’t not deny the aforementioned - unfortunately she’s about to win in a landslide

Do you seriously suspect -- deletedbyadmin -- of cheating? I don't know the others so won't comment on them, but I can assure you, I've played -- deletedbyadmin -- several times, if he's cheating then I am Nelson Mandela.

"If I didn't win they cheated" seems to be a familiar refrain these days, heard this elsewhere lately. Also someone should have a talk with Large Marge:

None of the players I’ve named are cheaters. I just admire how good they are and am filled with self hate. Sorry everyone and lots of love to the fam!

None of the players I’ve named are cheaters. I just admire how good they are and am filled with self hate. Sorry everyone and lots of love to the fam!

None of the players I’ve named are cheaters. I just admire how good they are and am filled with self hate. Sorry everyone and lots of love to the fam!

FYI:

the forums are *not* the place to start calling out names -- that's why there's a link at the bottom of every game page (see below).

I have deleted references to those named in this thread.

Feel free to complain in the forums (altho constantly doing so will make you a pariah here), even feel free to ask some of the older ...hegemony... if they'd care to review some games if you're uncertain (then PM the game links directly to those of us); but save the specific accusations for Tom alone. It just breeds animosity that we don't want to encourage.

- - - - - - - - -

this is the link at the bottom of every game.

weathertop wrote:FYI:

the forums are *not* the place to start calling out names -- that's why there's a link at the bottom of every game page (see below).

Oh man, that's no fun!

You mean I'm not allowed to complain about zdisabled_fc56b4f4 or zdisabled_b0c46970 or ....

:-D

hehe

weathertop wrote:hehe

Saw this right after seeing Shredders broken reposting ( https://www.wargear.net/forum/showthread/4082/Board_Revival_Group#post_1094), and literally did LOL.

Ozyman wrote:weathertop wrote:hehe

Saw this right after seeing Shredders broken reposting ( https://www.wargear.net/forum/showthread/4082/Board_Revival_Group#post_1094" target="_blank"> https://www.wargear.net/forum/showthread/4082/Board_Revival_Group#post_1094), and literally did LOL.

i had just finished reading that prior to replying here. LOL

M57 wrote: ..unless of course you think he [Tom] is part of the conspiracy, and dines on trafficked baby flesh.👹

..I've always wanted to learn to play the hegemonica.

Number one, I've heard that it goes well with mashed potatoes. Number two, I'd love to learn too. Anyone down for group lessons?