User Tools

Site Tools


designer_workshop:review_board_criteria

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
designer_workshop:review_board_criteria [2013/08/29 15:04]
weathertop [Protocols]
designer_workshop:review_board_criteria [2014/04/03 23:17]
weathertop [Standard Criteria and Guidelines]
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Review Process Protocols ====== ====== Review Process Protocols ======
  
-Board review is intended both to help designers produce better boards and to maintain a high level of quality for live maps on WarGear. However, when it comes down to it, board review is a matter of judgment. This page is meant to help all parties, both reviewers and board designers, by providing a transparent set of guidelines that seek to better define what is and is not expected of a board in order to meet WarGear standards. Also see the WarGear help page concerning the [[http://www.wargear.net/help/display/Board%20Review|Review Process]].+Board review is intended both to help designers produce better boards and to maintain a high level of quality for live boards on WarGear. However, when it comes down to it, board review is a matter of judgment. This page is meant to help all parties, both reviewers and board designers, by providing a transparent set of guidelines that seek to better define what is and is not expected of a board in order to meet WarGear standards. See more detail on the [[designer_workshop:review_board_criteria:Talk|Review Process Protocols Talk Page]].
  
 ===== Mission ===== ===== Mission =====
Line 9: Line 9:
 ===== Standard Criteria and Guidelines ===== ===== Standard Criteria and Guidelines =====
  
-WarGear Standards use the IEEE style guide for standards.  "Shall" is used to define a requirement that if not satisfied will prevent the board from going live.   "Should" is used to suggest a best practice, but does not denote an automatic disqualification.  See the [[designer_workshop:review_board_criteria:Talk|Talk Page]] for more details.+WarGear Standards use the IEEE style guide for standards.  "Shall" is used to define a requirement that if not satisfied will prevent the board from going live.   "Should" is used to suggest a best practice, but does not denote an automatic disqualification.  See the [[designer_workshop:review_board_criteria:Talk|Review Process Protocols Talk Page]] for more details.
  
 ==== General Guidelines ====  ==== General Guidelines ==== 
Line 33: Line 33:
     * Make eliminations more valuable - card capture on, increase elimination bonus.     * Make eliminations more valuable - card capture on, increase elimination bonus.
     * Increase bottlenecks     * Increase bottlenecks
-    * Create '[[:wargear_glossary|super continents]]' or [[designer_tutorials:tutorials:other_continents:other_continents#collector_continents|collector continents]] for late-game objectives. +    * Create '[[:wargear_glossary#Super_Continent|super continents]]' or [[designer_tutorials:tutorials:other_continents:other_continents#collector_continents|collector continents]] for late-game objectives.
- +
 ==== Other ==== ==== Other ====
   * Every board should have a wiki page created for it on the [[proving_grounds:proving_grounds]] when its review game starts.  When the game finishes that page is moved to the [[boards:the_complete_board_list]]   * Every board should have a wiki page created for it on the [[proving_grounds:proving_grounds]] when its review game starts.  When the game finishes that page is moved to the [[boards:the_complete_board_list]]
designer_workshop/review_board_criteria.txt · Last modified: 2015/04/17 13:39 by Ozyman